Timeline for Sure, we like the IDEA of voting, but we are poor in our actions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.serverfault.com/ with https://meta.serverfault.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.serverfault.com/ with https://meta.serverfault.com/
|
|
| Oct 4, 2013 at 18:36 | comment | added | DanBig | Your 3 points hit home with me. | |
| Oct 4, 2013 at 5:03 | comment | added | user62491 | @Iain - Agreed. The good content to crap content ratio here is really poor. But it's really hard to pysche myself up and spend an hour writing a decent question when it receives a single upvote and no comments. I feel like everyone on meta is screaming, "Where is the good content?" but the good content I see out there has one or two upvotes and a comment. This site is drying up. | |
| Oct 3, 2013 at 13:03 | comment | added | TheCleaner | Maybe all us regulars are going about this the wrong way and should just pull up each others accounts and just review/upvote/downvote ourselves. SF 1%'ers! ;) | |
| Oct 3, 2013 at 12:57 | comment | added | TheCleaner | I feel you on your "SCCM question" issue. I've posted a few questions lately that were well laid out and researched. No up votes, no answers, no comments. I don't expect as quick an answer as a question about mod rewrite rules or AD, but I get where you are coming from on that one. | |
| Oct 3, 2013 at 6:02 | comment | added | user9517 | I think you're right, finding good questions that can be answered well is too difficult. There are too few people who care beyond getting their (mostly crappy) questions answered and too much crap to deal with. | |
| Oct 2, 2013 at 22:08 | history | answered | user62491 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |