Timeline for Does the serial down voting algorithm take previous behavior into account?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2014 at 16:42 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | @MDMarra The history doesn't show who did the 3 downvotes; there's a minimum number of votes before someone shows up. The original person did 10, they got reversed, the other person (could also be separate people) aren't from the same IP. Could be a sock, but they need 125 rep to downvote... so, that's some dedication | |
| Jan 13, 2014 at 13:49 | comment | added | MDMarra | @MarkHenderson any chance they were sock puppets? It seems silly that they were back to back and on my highest rated non-wiki answers. | |
| Jan 11, 2014 at 23:41 | comment | added | Mark Henderson Mod | Did a quick check; looks like these -3 were not from the same user as the first -10 | |
| Jan 11, 2014 at 15:24 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | Likely... Might want to use the "contact" at the bottom of the page. See what they say. | |
| Jan 11, 2014 at 14:56 | comment | added | MDMarra | Still nope. Seems like someone sufficiently persistent can get around it. | |
| Jan 11, 2014 at 14:31 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | It runs at 03:00 UTC, not midnight. | |
| Jan 11, 2014 at 3:36 | comment | added | MDMarra | Hm, looks like it wasn't reversed at 00:00 UTC | |
| Jan 10, 2014 at 19:37 | history | answered | Chris SMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |