Timeline for what do you do when a serverfault moderator posts negative, ad hominem comments on your question?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Apr 9, 2014 at 19:49 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | A few years back, OpenOffice was in much the same state as this guy's project. Yet it was successfully disentangled from its bundled dependencies. I doubt he's got anything bigger than an office suite to package... | |
| Apr 9, 2014 at 19:39 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | @MichaelHampton "ad hominem" is attacking someone's character instead of responding to their logical criticism. A simple example would be someone criticizing your argument, and respond with "well, you're ugly". Unfortunately jxqz is using the term incorrectly. He could have tried a "no true scotsman" argument, that you were dismissing his problem on account of impurity - which would be vaguely accurate, though "don't do that" is a valid response to some questions here. | |
| Apr 9, 2014 at 19:23 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | Yes, and you're doing it again. You really should quit while you're behind. | |
| Apr 9, 2014 at 19:22 | comment | added | jxqz | Oh, this guy again. Yeah, dude I'm so rude to you. What irony. | |
| Apr 9, 2014 at 19:21 | history | answered | Michael HamptonMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |