Skip to main content
Server Fault

Return to Question

replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

This question http://serverfault.com/questions/590163/monitoring-server-statisticshttps://serverfault.com/questions/590163/monitoring-server-statistics Is being marked as a duplicate of What tool do you use to monitor your servers?What tool do you use to monitor your servers?

The latter question is a locked offtopic "historically significant" question.

Should we be using those to close as duplicates? Should that old question even still exist? It is quite out of date, which is the reason product recommendations are offtopic. Pointing someone at that question isn't likely to help them very much, and may even confuse them further.

What should we be doing with these questions?

This question http://serverfault.com/questions/590163/monitoring-server-statistics Is being marked as a duplicate of What tool do you use to monitor your servers?

The latter question is a locked offtopic "historically significant" question.

Should we be using those to close as duplicates? Should that old question even still exist? It is quite out of date, which is the reason product recommendations are offtopic. Pointing someone at that question isn't likely to help them very much, and may even confuse them further.

What should we be doing with these questions?

This question https://serverfault.com/questions/590163/monitoring-server-statistics Is being marked as a duplicate of What tool do you use to monitor your servers?

The latter question is a locked offtopic "historically significant" question.

Should we be using those to close as duplicates? Should that old question even still exist? It is quite out of date, which is the reason product recommendations are offtopic. Pointing someone at that question isn't likely to help them very much, and may even confuse them further.

What should we be doing with these questions?

Source Link
Grant
Grant
  • 18k
  • 14
  • 9

Duplicate of a locked "historical significance" question?

This question http://serverfault.com/questions/590163/monitoring-server-statistics Is being marked as a duplicate of What tool do you use to monitor your servers?

The latter question is a locked offtopic "historically significant" question.

Should we be using those to close as duplicates? Should that old question even still exist? It is quite out of date, which is the reason product recommendations are offtopic. Pointing someone at that question isn't likely to help them very much, and may even confuse them further.

What should we be doing with these questions?