Timeline for How to deal with incorrect reviews
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2014 at 16:21 | vote | accept | kasperd | ||
| May 24, 2014 at 15:47 | comment | added | kasperd | That I could have. But there wasn't another reason where I thought that it should definitely without doubt be closed for that reason. | |
| May 24, 2014 at 15:33 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | You could also have chosen to close with a different reason than the one given in the review. | |
| May 24, 2014 at 15:31 | comment | added | kasperd | Had the question been presented to me with off-topic as the reason, I might have followed suit if I agreed with the more specific reason. Otherwise I would probably have skipped it because I think that is the right thing to do, if you aren't certain what answer should be given. But I still think keeping open is appropriate if the reason given for closing is clearly not applicable. | |
| May 24, 2014 at 15:18 | history | edited | Michael HamptonMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 178 characters in body
|
| May 24, 2014 at 15:07 | history | answered | Michael HamptonMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |