Timeline for Why are review audits so slow?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2015 at 19:43 | comment | added | kasperd | I just came across an audit which had chosen an original of such quality that the subject made slightly more sense after the random edits. | |
| Jul 9, 2014 at 19:56 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | @kasperd There is a similar delay before "good" audits as well - it's just very slightly shorter. (Though there is some merit to the notion that someone could robo-review until they notice a delay and then actually pay attention to that review. Like I said - it's a flawed system, but it's (marginally) better than nothing...) | |
| Jul 9, 2014 at 19:16 | comment | added | kasperd | When I said they are obvious, I wasn't referring to the edit itself, but rather to the time it takes to load. These edits are easy to recognize from looking at the edit itself, but they are even easier to recognize from the delay before they show up. (Those who want to go through the reviews without looking could just keep clicking approve until they hit the delay, and then move to reject.) | |
| Jul 9, 2014 at 18:14 | history | answered | voretaq7Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |