Timeline for Pictures of text, acceptable or not?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2014 at 9:27 | answer | added | Dennis Nolte | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 2, 2014 at 4:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/ServerFault/status/495418830840410112 | ||
| Aug 1, 2014 at 15:22 | comment | added | Parthian Shot | What if they got a screenshot from someone else (e.g. the helpdesk got it from a client), and in researching the problem they haven't found a good solution, but they also don't want to type out the entire ream of JVM stack trace they've been researching / find and figure out how to use a good OCR system that will transcribe the text for them? | |
| Jul 28, 2014 at 6:53 | answer | added | kasperd | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 28, 2014 at 5:07 | comment | added | user9517 | @MichaelHampton I was careful to say terminal for a reason. | |
| Jul 28, 2014 at 1:47 | answer | added | ewwhite | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jul 28, 2014 at 1:30 | comment | added | ewwhite | Can you provide some examples of questions where this is a problem? | |
| Jul 28, 2014 at 0:43 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | @Iain Yes, if it's a screenshot from PuTTY, then they might not be a professional. If it's a screenshot of a server console over IPMI or whatever, then they just might be. | |
| Jul 27, 2014 at 21:28 | answer | added | Michael HamptonMod | timeline score: 23 | |
| Jul 27, 2014 at 21:17 | comment | added | user9517 | Where possible they should be avoided. If they are the output from a terminal then they often point to an OP that really isn't in our target audience. | |
| Jul 27, 2014 at 21:03 | history | asked | Håkan Lindqvist | CC BY-SA 3.0 |