Timeline for Can the off-topic close reasons be re-arranged?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2015 at 10:04 | comment | added | kasperd | Reading the question and deciding which of the close reasons is appropriate shouldn't be too automated. But once you have decided which of the close reasons is appropriate, the few clicks to chose it should be fairly automatic (unless the close reason you intended to use no longer exists). | |
| Feb 27, 2015 at 4:32 | history | edited | Michael HamptonMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 359 characters in body
|
| Aug 1, 2014 at 17:14 | comment | added | Ward - Trying Codidact Mod | That would just be whining, whereas my complaint is, of course, totally reasonable and valid. | |
| Aug 1, 2014 at 15:14 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | Then someone else will come along and complain about them being rearranged again... You just can't win. | |
| Aug 1, 2014 at 14:56 | comment | added | Ward - Trying Codidact Mod | Could you delete and then re-create the generic "not relevant to professional system admin" reason? Or maybe an SE staff member reading this could re-arrange them... | |
| Aug 1, 2014 at 13:42 | history | answered | Michael HamptonMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |