Return to Answer

I still believe the consensus here: Inactive mods on SF - Or are they?

I see the same 2-3 moderators all day long on SF. Granted that's my timezone and perspective, but it's the only perspective I can speak from. The link above that Pauska asked shows that it really hasn't changed over the years.

2 moderators were appointed back in 2009 and are rarely active on SF at least from what I can see. I'm sure they are great people...that's not the point here.

There's also this procedure to remove an existing moderator: Handling Calls to Remove a Moderator

SO...do you as a nominee feel that moderators should have term limits or be required to be re-elected? Do you feel there should be a way to formally ask a moderator to "step down" for inactivity based on a vote of the users or is this something that should only be handled by other moderators and/or SE staff?

I still believe the consensus here: Inactive mods on SF - Or are they?

I see the same 2-3 moderators all day long on SF. Granted that's my timezone and perspective, but it's the only perspective I can speak from. The link above that Pauska asked shows that it really hasn't changed over the years.

2 moderators were appointed back in 2009 and are rarely active on SF at least from what I can see. I'm sure they are great people...that's not the point here.

There's also this procedure to remove an existing moderator: Handling Calls to Remove a Moderator

SO...do you as a nominee feel that moderators should have term limits or be required to be re-elected? Do you feel there should be a way to formally ask a moderator to "step down" for inactivity based on a vote of the users or is this something that should only be handled by other moderators and/or SE staff?

I still believe the consensus here: Inactive mods on SF - Or are they?

I see the same 2-3 moderators all day long on SF. Granted that's my timezone and perspective, but it's the only perspective I can speak from. The link above that Pauska asked shows that it really hasn't changed over the years.

2 moderators were appointed back in 2009 and are rarely active on SF at least from what I can see. I'm sure they are great people...that's not the point here.

There's also this procedure to remove an existing moderator: Handling Calls to Remove a Moderator

SO...do you as a nominee feel that moderators should have term limits or be required to be re-elected? Do you feel there should be a way to formally ask a moderator to "step down" for inactivity based on a vote of the users or is this something that should only be handled by other moderators and/or SE staff?

I still believe the consensus here: Inactive mods on SF - Or are they?

I see the same 2-3 moderators all day long on SF. Granted that's my timezone and perspective, but it's the only perspective I can speak from. The link above that Pauska asked shows that it really hasn't changed over the years.

2 moderators were appointed back in 2009 and are rarely active on SF at least from what I can see. I'm sure they are great people...that's not the point here.

There's also this procedure to remove an existing moderator: Handling Calls to Remove a Moderator

SO...do you as a nominee feel that moderators should have term limits or be required to be re-elected? Do you feel there should be a way to formally ask a moderator to "step down" for inactivity based on a vote of the users or is this something that should only be handled by other moderators and/or SE staff?