Timeline for Server Fault needs professional-quality questions, not just questions from professionals
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.serverfault.com/ with https://meta.serverfault.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.serverfault.com/ with https://meta.serverfault.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:51 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.networkengineering.stackexchange.com/ with https://networkengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 24, 2014 at 15:42 | comment | added | Mike Pennington | Regardless of what they want to do, we need to make it clear what's required to help them in each situation. Over time, they might discover the value of fully documenting their question, because they wind up getting the help they want, and might even learn something in the process. | |
| Nov 24, 2014 at 15:22 | comment | added | user9517 | The reason people don't want to document things is that they're not systems or network people. They see no value in it or the systems or networks they are just another tool they want working. They are hack coders and all they really want to do it get on with thrashing at the keyboard to get the next block buster app out the door. | |
| Nov 23, 2014 at 0:43 | comment | added | Mike Pennington | The requested feature should happen while a question is still open. As for the effort required to populate the scorecard, it's up to the community to help people ask good questions. Scorecard templates is an effort to make it easier to give constructive feedback, as well as prioritizing what changes the community wants. I think Stack Exchange should do more to reward community review efforts, and I include this feature as the kind of effort SE should reward with points to reviewers. | |
| Nov 22, 2014 at 19:43 | comment | added | Shane Madden StaffMod | So for the feature request, are you thinking this will supplement or replace the current "descriptive close reasons plus comments" system for getting more information out of people? The main concern I'd have would be that getting those scorecards populated with good information would take a lot of effort on the part of the reviewers, and might not be the most rewarding way for them to spend their time on the site. On the mobile front, have you tried out the iOS/Android apps? | |
| Nov 22, 2014 at 10:33 | history | answered | Mike Pennington | CC BY-SA 3.0 |