Skip to main content
Server Fault

Return to Answer

added 13 characters in body
Source Link
user9517
user9517
  • 116.8k
  • 4
  • 55
  • 131

It used to cost the person who down voted a question 1 fake internet point. It was determined that this was sufficient to stop people from down voting questions that really needed it so for questions, it's now free to down vote.

The only guidance available for down voting is in the tooltip

This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful.

What you see is community members exercising their privilege, using the tools they have available, to try to enforce quality. Quality is a real issue on Server Fault, we need so much more of it.

every question deserves an answer, even the dull ones.

92% of all questions on SF have a written answer and pretty much all questions get answers even if the answer is your question is not a good fit'question is not a good fit' or is so poorly written/presented/vague as to be unanswerable'is so poorly written/presented/vague as to be unanswerable'.

It used to cost the person who down voted a question 1 fake internet point. It was determined that this was sufficient to stop people from down voting questions that really needed it so for questions it's now free to down vote.

The only guidance available for down voting is in the tooltip

This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful.

What you see is community members exercising their privilege using the tools they have available to try to enforce quality. Quality is a real issue on Server Fault, we need so much more of it.

every question deserves an answer, even the dull ones.

92% of all questions on SF have a written answer and pretty much all questions get answers even if the answer is your question is not a good fit or is so poorly written/presented/vague as to be unanswerable.

It used to cost the person who down voted a question 1 fake internet point. It was determined that this was sufficient to stop people from down voting questions that really needed it so for questions, it's now free to down vote.

The only guidance available for down voting is in the tooltip

This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful.

What you see is community members exercising their privilege, using the tools they have available, to try to enforce quality. Quality is a real issue on Server Fault, we need so much more of it.

every question deserves an answer, even the dull ones.

92% of all questions on SF have a written answer and pretty much all questions get answers even if the answer is your 'question is not a good fit' or 'is so poorly written/presented/vague as to be unanswerable'.

Source Link
user9517
user9517
  • 116.8k
  • 4
  • 55
  • 131

It used to cost the person who down voted a question 1 fake internet point. It was determined that this was sufficient to stop people from down voting questions that really needed it so for questions it's now free to down vote.

The only guidance available for down voting is in the tooltip

This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful.

What you see is community members exercising their privilege using the tools they have available to try to enforce quality. Quality is a real issue on Server Fault, we need so much more of it.

every question deserves an answer, even the dull ones.

92% of all questions on SF have a written answer and pretty much all questions get answers even if the answer is your question is not a good fit or is so poorly written/presented/vague as to be unanswerable.