Timeline for Proposed change to Server Fault guidelines
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.serverfault.com/ with https://meta.serverfault.com/
|
|
| Dec 10, 2014 at 8:37 | history | edited | 200_success | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed example in response to Rev 6 of the question
|
| Dec 5, 2014 at 22:24 | comment | added | 200_success | @ShaneMadden I think this change addresses the wrong problem. Can you cite examples of ad hominem discrimination? It's not like we verify your employment status. If you ask a question that is of professional quality, then Server Fault treats you as a professional. Change that wording/requirement, and Server Fault loses its elevator pitch. | |
| Dec 5, 2014 at 21:37 | comment | added | Shane Madden StaffMod | The primary thing I'm trying to accomplish is to move the focus from the person asking the question to the question itself - "professional" invites us to look at the person, when we should be looking at the question. If an amateur asks a great question about how to set something up for a mailing list, then yes, I'm saying it should be in scope - because a well-asked question helps both professionals and non-professionals with the same problem. | |
| Dec 5, 2014 at 17:05 | history | edited | 200_success | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 236 characters in body
|
| Dec 5, 2014 at 16:35 | history | answered | 200_success | CC BY-SA 3.0 |