Timeline for What can we do to fix the "Reasonable management practices" close reason?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Jan 8, 2015 at 19:56 | comment | added | Shane Madden StaffMod | @TheCleaner Haha, fair enough! | |
| Jan 8, 2015 at 19:54 | comment | added | TheCleaner | BTW @ShaneMadden I think the only thing really lacking from the existing close choices is a clear enough "your question is completely stupid...I think so and so would most experts here", that's what I was hoping to convey without straight up offending the OP. | |
| Jan 8, 2015 at 19:50 | comment | added | TheCleaner |
I personally think "Questions without a clear problem statement are not useful to other readers and are unlikely to get good answers." should simply be removed from the other one. Possibly combine it with this one in the Meta link explanation? -- By wrong site do you mean wrong SE site? If so, I think the existing Migration choices are enough.
|
|
| Jan 8, 2015 at 19:18 | comment | added | Shane Madden StaffMod |
I feel like this overlaps a bit with installation, configuration or diagnostic help; sufficient information about the configuration and environment to reproduce it, and attempted solutions kinda covers "lack of basic research" and without a clear problem statement are not useful to other readers kinda covers "isn't going to be of value to the IT community". But I like the direction you're going with this. Do you think we should also add a "wrong site" reason in addition to this one?
|
|
| Jan 8, 2015 at 14:41 | comment | added | TheCleaner | Yes, the Meta post itself can be there but Protected. But even current close reason links to Meta answers exist without protection and it's very rare to see someone comment there after clicking it. Likely they don't even click it, but if they did they probably don't have enough rep in Meta to comment. | |
| Jan 8, 2015 at 14:38 | comment | added | Reaces | I like yours better than mine, although the 5 R's comes of as a bit contrived to me personally. I also like the idea of a link giving more explanation and filling out the close reason a bit more. Is it possible to have the post locked from comments etc? Otherwise I feel a lot of "Why did I get closed!" comments are going to be placed there. | |
| Jan 8, 2015 at 14:32 | history | edited | TheCleaner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 102 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2015 at 14:23 | history | answered | TheCleaner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |