Skip to main content
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
Source Link

A three year old questionquestion of mine was just put "on hold" for relating to "working with a service provider's management interface, such as cPanelworking with a service provider's management interface, such as cPanel."

The wording here is a little ambiguous. I understand why end use of panel software would be out of scope. However, configuring these panels does require sysadmin knowledge, and would otherwise be in scope.

I was surprised that an individual non moderator could place a question on hold that has been answered for over three years.What's the process for disputing that status?

A three year old question of mine was just put "on hold" for relating to "working with a service provider's management interface, such as cPanel."

The wording here is a little ambiguous. I understand why end use of panel software would be out of scope. However, configuring these panels does require sysadmin knowledge, and would otherwise be in scope.

I was surprised that an individual non moderator could place a question on hold that has been answered for over three years.What's the process for disputing that status?

A three year old question of mine was just put "on hold" for relating to "working with a service provider's management interface, such as cPanel."

The wording here is a little ambiguous. I understand why end use of panel software would be out of scope. However, configuring these panels does require sysadmin knowledge, and would otherwise be in scope.

I was surprised that an individual non moderator could place a question on hold that has been answered for over three years.What's the process for disputing that status?

Source Link
Sean W.
  • 371
  • 1
  • 1

Is a question about configuring a server admin panel off topic?

A three year old question of mine was just put "on hold" for relating to "working with a service provider's management interface, such as cPanel."

The wording here is a little ambiguous. I understand why end use of panel software would be out of scope. However, configuring these panels does require sysadmin knowledge, and would otherwise be in scope.

I was surprised that an individual non moderator could place a question on hold that has been answered for over three years.What's the process for disputing that status?