I recently had this answer in my queue.

I flagged it as being NAA because to me it simply states having a similar problem as the OP.

As it stands, to me itlooks like this answer can't in any way provide an answer to the question, which if this post is an indication should be a reason to flag it. Now this post is meta.SE and not meta.SF, so perhaps I'm wrong.

Reading it, it looks like the person answering had a problem, and what the OP did was his solution.
I don't see how that adds any value to the topic.
Regardless of if it's correct or not, if the answer doesn't actually offer a possible solution, should we keep it? If your answer is I did what you did without stating what was different with what you did... How does that constitute an answer?

My main reason for asking is future flagging, my current assumption is that I'm probably incorrect. But as it stands I don't think I'd do it differently next time. Because I just don't see the difference between this answer and a me too.

I recently had this answer in my queue.

I flagged it as being NAA because to me it simply states having a similar problem as the OP.

As it stands, to me itlooks like this answer can't in any way provide an answer to the question, which if this post is an indication should be a reason to flag it. Now this post is meta.SE and not meta.SF, so perhaps I'm wrong.

Reading it, it looks like the person answering had a problem, and what the OP did was his solution.
I don't see how that adds any value to the topic.
Regardless of if it's correct or not, if the answer doesn't actually offer a possible solution, should we keep it? If your answer is I did what you did without stating what was different with what you did... How does that constitute an answer?

My main reason for asking is future flagging, my current assumption is that I'm probably incorrect. But as it stands I don't think I'd do it differently next time. Because I just don't see the difference between this answer and a me too.

I recently had this answer in my queue.

I flagged it as being NAA because to me it simply states having a similar problem as the OP.

As it stands, to me itlooks like this answer can't in any way provide an answer to the question, which if this post is an indication should be a reason to flag it. Now this post is meta.SE and not meta.SF, so perhaps I'm wrong.

Reading it, it looks like the person answering had a problem, and what the OP did was his solution.
I don't see how that adds any value to the topic.
Regardless of if it's correct or not, if the answer doesn't actually offer a possible solution, should we keep it? If your answer is I did what you did without stating what was different with what you did... How does that constitute an answer?

My main reason for asking is future flagging, my current assumption is that I'm probably incorrect. But as it stands I don't think I'd do it differently next time. Because I just don't see the difference between this answer and a me too.

I recently had this answer in my queue.

I flagged it as being NAA because to me it simply states having a similar problem as the OP.

As it stands, to me itlooks like this answer can't in any way provide an answer to the question, which if this post is an indication should be a reason to flag it. Now this post is meta.SE and not meta.SF, so perhaps I'm wrong.

Reading it, it looks like the person answering had a problem, and what the OP did was his solution.
I don't see how that adds any value to the topic.
Regardless of if it's correct or not, if the answer doesn't actually offer a possible solution, should we keep it? If your answer is I did what you did without stating what was different with what you did... How does that constitute an answer?

My main reason for asking is future flagging, my current assumption is that I'm probably incorrect. But as it stands I don't think I'd do it differently next time. Because I just don't see the difference between this answer and a me too.