Timeline for Rules regarding comments and edits and holds
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 24, 2015 at 17:07 | comment | added | HopelessN00b Mod | @Jeff you asked for an explanation of when people are allowed to close (on hold) a question, so that's what I answered. When it's "fair" to close a question is an entirely different, and largely irrelevant question. Like everything else in life, people are rarely fair, so it's a theoretical discussion at best. | |
| Feb 24, 2015 at 16:31 | comment | added | Jeff | But isn't that unfair to close a question because you don't like it? Someone out there needs and answer and this is where they get their help. @HopelessN00b | |
| Feb 24, 2015 at 7:16 | comment | added | HopelessN00b Mod | @MadHatter Exception that proves the rule, then. :) | |
| Feb 24, 2015 at 7:14 | comment | added | MadHatter | OK, have it your way. You're right. Democracy is a total failure. Meanwhile, the small army of us who voted for you in the clear knowledge of your platform will keep on watching the immense amount of mod work you're putting in on things like improving the tag system and tidying up hundreds - if not thousands, by now - of old questions, whilst still keeping a diligent eye on the front page for ordinarily bad questions. A total failure of democracy if ever I saw one, that. | |
| Feb 24, 2015 at 5:35 | history | edited | HopelessN00bMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 10 characters in body
|
| Feb 24, 2015 at 5:18 | history | answered | HopelessN00bMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |