Skip to main content
Server Fault

Return to Answer

replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

I don't know why it was deleted. I would guess it might have had something to do with the user's apparent unwillingness to pursue the issue; he seems to have just given up.

I wouldn't have deleted it, but I would have closed it as a duplicate of Securely wipe a headless remote linux serverSecurely wipe a headless remote linux server which is pretty much an identical situation and has a few good ideas he doesn't seem to have considered.

I don't know why it was deleted. I would guess it might have had something to do with the user's apparent unwillingness to pursue the issue; he seems to have just given up.

I wouldn't have deleted it, but I would have closed it as a duplicate of Securely wipe a headless remote linux server which is pretty much an identical situation and has a few good ideas he doesn't seem to have considered.

I don't know why it was deleted. I would guess it might have had something to do with the user's apparent unwillingness to pursue the issue; he seems to have just given up.

I wouldn't have deleted it, but I would have closed it as a duplicate of Securely wipe a headless remote linux server which is pretty much an identical situation and has a few good ideas he doesn't seem to have considered.

Point link to the actual question mentioned in the link text
Source Link
kasperd
kasperd
  • 31k
  • 1
  • 12
  • 26

I don't know why it was deleted. I would guess it might have had something to do with the user's apparent unwillingness to pursue the issue; he seems to have just given up.

I wouldn't have deleted it, but I would have closed it as a duplicate of Securely wipe a headless remote linux serverSecurely wipe a headless remote linux server which is pretty much an identical situation and has a few good ideas he doesn't seem to have considered.

I don't know why it was deleted. I would guess it might have had something to do with the user's apparent unwillingness to pursue the issue; he seems to have just given up.

I wouldn't have deleted it, but I would have closed it as a duplicate of Securely wipe a headless remote linux server which is pretty much an identical situation and has a few good ideas he doesn't seem to have considered.

I don't know why it was deleted. I would guess it might have had something to do with the user's apparent unwillingness to pursue the issue; he seems to have just given up.

I wouldn't have deleted it, but I would have closed it as a duplicate of Securely wipe a headless remote linux server which is pretty much an identical situation and has a few good ideas he doesn't seem to have considered.

Source Link
Michael Hampton Mod
Michael Hampton Mod
  • 251k
  • 1
  • 55
  • 126

I don't know why it was deleted. I would guess it might have had something to do with the user's apparent unwillingness to pursue the issue; he seems to have just given up.

I wouldn't have deleted it, but I would have closed it as a duplicate of Securely wipe a headless remote linux server which is pretty much an identical situation and has a few good ideas he doesn't seem to have considered.