Timeline for Can ServerFault/StackExchange automatically "title" Microsoft Knowlege Base links?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://security.stackexchange.com/ with https://security.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 6, 2015 at 18:50 | comment | added | Jim B | I agree that URLS should be visible. There is no need to obfuscate the source | |
| Apr 1, 2015 at 13:45 | comment | added | TheCleaner | @Sven yep understand. I won't lose sleep over this either way. Just figured it was a "delighter" not a "must be". | |
| Mar 31, 2015 at 19:45 | comment | added | Hyppy | I personally prefer #3. In any case, it's the choice of the person creating the link, wouldn't you think? | |
| Mar 31, 2015 at 18:42 | comment | added | Sven Mod | It's just a tip by the W3C, not a rule, and not a particular good one, IMHO. Also, what I understand they are talking about would be "To read more about it, click here". I know you want the third variant, I just meant to illustrate why I don't like it. But I really don't have a strong opinion on it, I justed wanted to demonstrate not everybody wants or likes this feature, even if "not everybody" might only mean just me :) | |
| Mar 31, 2015 at 18:31 | comment | added | TheCleaner | So to your point #1 Hampton addressed. On #2 the problem there is that the URL could be quite long and possibly nonsensical if you just leave it as a visible URL. On #3 that's essentially what I'm asking for. The hope being that the text itself lends to searching if the URL is broken... | |
| Mar 31, 2015 at 18:09 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | w3.org/QA/Tips/noClickHere | |
| Mar 31, 2015 at 17:53 | history | answered | SvenMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |