Skip to main content
added 23 characters in body
Source Link
Sven Mod
  • 100.3k
  • 2
  • 40
  • 70

Most likely no, due to a more or less arbitrary limitation imposed by the SE staff. I can't find relevant discussions right now, but if I remember correctly, there was much debate to even get a fourth migration target instead of the usual three (not counting meta.sf).

Also: I very rarely migrate anything to a site not on the list and for the small number of cases, it's not really relevant IMHO.

Most likely no, due to a more or less arbitrary limitation imposed by the SE staff. I can't find relevant discussions right now, but if I remember correctly, there was much debate to even get a fourth migration target instead of the usual three.

Also: I very rarely migrate anything to a site not on the list and for the small number of cases, it's not really relevant IMHO.

Most likely no, due to a more or less arbitrary limitation imposed by the SE staff. I can't find relevant discussions right now, but if I remember correctly, there was much debate to even get a fourth migration target instead of the usual three (not counting meta.sf).

Also: I very rarely migrate anything to a site not on the list and for the small number of cases, it's not really relevant IMHO.

Source Link
Sven Mod
  • 100.3k
  • 2
  • 40
  • 70

Most likely no, due to a more or less arbitrary limitation imposed by the SE staff. I can't find relevant discussions right now, but if I remember correctly, there was much debate to even get a fourth migration target instead of the usual three.

Also: I very rarely migrate anything to a site not on the list and for the small number of cases, it's not really relevant IMHO.