Timeline for Canonical post in first post review, how to react?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Aug 12, 2015 at 20:00 | comment | added | Hyppy | The funny thing is, in the absence of a great amount of context or a banner saying they're exceptions, most canonical questions are off-topic. | |
| Aug 12, 2015 at 11:25 | comment | added | Reaces |
The test isn't there to see if you are adequately judging the questions. It's to see if you are paying attention. Even though this is probably a weird side-effect of the way ServerFault has implemented canonical questions, I'd say it's one of my favorite review audits. Less random chance of incorrect action and easy to judge for a person paying attention.
|
|
| Aug 12, 2015 at 11:14 | answer | added | sysadmin1138Mod | timeline score: 11 | |
| Aug 12, 2015 at 11:09 | history | asked | jornane | CC BY-SA 3.0 |