Skip to main content
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
Source Link

I flagged this answer as NAAthis answer as NAA.
The reasoning behind it being that it is clearly an attempted comment on the answer right below itright below it.
This flag has since been rejected for flags should not be used to indicate technical inaccuracies, or an altogether wrong answer.

Without the answer below it, the first answer is simply gibberish unrelated to the question.

Should I flag this differently? Should I in stead have down-voted it?
The information is clearly useful, simply miss-placed.

I flagged this answer as NAA.
The reasoning behind it being that it is clearly an attempted comment on the answer right below it.
This flag has since been rejected for flags should not be used to indicate technical inaccuracies, or an altogether wrong answer.

Without the answer below it, the first answer is simply gibberish unrelated to the question.

Should I flag this differently? Should I in stead have down-voted it?
The information is clearly useful, simply miss-placed.

I flagged this answer as NAA.
The reasoning behind it being that it is clearly an attempted comment on the answer right below it.
This flag has since been rejected for flags should not be used to indicate technical inaccuracies, or an altogether wrong answer.

Without the answer below it, the first answer is simply gibberish unrelated to the question.

Should I flag this differently? Should I in stead have down-voted it?
The information is clearly useful, simply miss-placed.

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/ServerFault/status/635541511384358912
Source Link
Reaces
  • 5.6k
  • 14
  • 24

Disagree with a declined flag

I flagged this answer as NAA.
The reasoning behind it being that it is clearly an attempted comment on the answer right below it.
This flag has since been rejected for flags should not be used to indicate technical inaccuracies, or an altogether wrong answer.

Without the answer below it, the first answer is simply gibberish unrelated to the question.

Should I flag this differently? Should I in stead have down-voted it?
The information is clearly useful, simply miss-placed.