Skip to main content
replaced http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/ with https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Over in area51 a debate is going on about this:

http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/questions/21958/why-a-proposal-for-identity-access-management-makes-sense

If you read the tag here on SF, could you weigh in on the discussion?

Over in area51 a debate is going on about this:

https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21958/why-a-proposal-for-identity-access-management-makes-sense

If you read the tag here on SF, could you weigh in on the discussion?

added 4 characters in body
Source Link
user9517
  • 116.8k
  • 4
  • 55
  • 131

Over in area51 a debate is going on about this:

http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/questions/21958/why-a-proposal-for-identity-access-management-makes-sense

If you read the password-management tag here on SF, could you weigh in on the discussion?

Over in area51 a debate is going on about this:

http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/questions/21958/why-a-proposal-for-identity-access-management-makes-sense

If you read the password-management tag here on SF, could you weigh in on the discussion?

Over in area51 a debate is going on about this:

http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/questions/21958/why-a-proposal-for-identity-access-management-makes-sense

If you read the tag here on SF, could you weigh in on the discussion?

Post Migrated Here from serverfault.com (revisions)
Source Link

Do readers of the password-management tag want a new community?

Over in area51 a debate is going on about this:

http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/questions/21958/why-a-proposal-for-identity-access-management-makes-sense

If you read the password-management tag here on SF, could you weigh in on the discussion?