Return to Answer

There is now.
It's not pretty, and there might be mistakes in there, I'll have to review it later.

You have to input the year, otherwise the graph looks like a mess (and I'm bad with graphs).
And it probably needs a few less joins...
But it's fast enough right now for ServerFault.

Fun little first thing I noticed, if you look at each year, the 0-100 group used to be the minority, it has steadily grown to be the most active group on the site.
Meanwhile the 10000+ group has been slowly declining (all-be-it much slower).

There is now.
It's not pretty, and there might be mistakes in there, I'll have to review it later.

You have to input the year, otherwise the graph looks like a mess (and I'm bad with graphs).
And it probably needs a few less joins...
But it's fast enough right now for ServerFault.

Fun little first thing I noticed, if you look at each year, the 0-100 group used to be the minority, it has steadily grown to be the most active group on the site.
Meanwhile the 10000+ group has been slowly declining (all-be-it much slower).

There is now.
It's not pretty, and there might be mistakes in there, I'll have to review it later.

You have to input the year, otherwise the graph looks like a mess (and I'm bad with graphs).
And it probably needs a few less joins...
But it's fast enough right now for ServerFault.

Fun little first thing I noticed, if you look at each year, the 0-100 group used to be the minority, it has steadily grown to be the most active group on the site.
Meanwhile the 1000+ group has been slowly declining (all-be-it much slower).

There is now.
It's not pretty, and there might be mistakes in there, I'll have to review it later.

You have to input the year, otherwise the graph looks like a mess (and I'm bad with graphs).
And it probably needs a few less joins...
But it's fast enough right now for ServerFault.

Fun little first thing I noticed, if you look at each year, the 0-100 group used to be the minority, it has steadily grown to be the most active group on the site.
Meanwhile the 10000+ group has been slowly declining (all-be-it much slower).

There is now.
It's not pretty, and there might be mistakes in there, I'll have to review it later.

You have to input the year, otherwise the graph looks like a mess (and I'm bad with graphs).
And it probably needs a few less joins...
But it's fast enough right now for ServerFault.

There is now.
It's not pretty, and there might be mistakes in there, I'll have to review it later.

You have to input the year, otherwise the graph looks like a mess (and I'm bad with graphs).
And it probably needs a few less joins...
But it's fast enough right now for ServerFault.

Fun little first thing I noticed, if you look at each year, the 0-100 group used to be the minority, it has steadily grown to be the most active group on the site.
Meanwhile the 1000+ group has been slowly declining (all-be-it much slower).