Timeline for Why is this question on "determing number of domains under a registrar" OffTopic for Serverfault?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:33 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/ with https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 2, 2015 at 16:55 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | @Vek.M1234 Repeating yourself again and again is not going to get you anywhere. | |
| Nov 2, 2015 at 8:49 | comment | added | user176193 | tell that to this guy: blog.legitscript.com/2015/01/… "We were not able to identify every domain name that NetLynx has in its portfolio, but were able to grab a good chunk of them for analysis — just over 7,000. I asked our team to look at domain names that 1) are currently active rogue Internet pharmacies;" | |
| Nov 2, 2015 at 5:40 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | You are mistaken: Determining what domains a registrar has registered is in no way essential to determine if the registrar is disreputable. It's actually not necessary at all. That is probably why you do not understand why your question has been poorly received. | |
| Nov 2, 2015 at 4:30 | comment | added | user176193 |
The charter states that questions regarding: managing information technology systems in a business environment. is a legitimate request. How is a question on determining the domains under a registrar illegitimate, when it is essential to determining if the registrar is disreputable (a large number of illegal pharmaceutical firms under one registrar is indicative of collusion)
|
|
| Nov 2, 2015 at 4:20 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | Do you have a specific complaint? I see nothing that "violates the rules laid out in the charter" here. | |
| Nov 2, 2015 at 4:16 | comment | added | user176193 | then edit the charter to reflect the consensus - arbitrary and high handed behavior that violates the rules laid out in the charter is wrong | |
| Nov 2, 2015 at 4:10 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | Here's some friendly advice: The community decides what is on topic here, "charter" notwithstanding (and it won't stand, since it's editable). | |
| Nov 2, 2015 at 4:05 | comment | added | user176193 | this may not be what you do, that's hardly our concern. this place is indexed by google and has a large audience - the only criteria is whether it is Off Topic as laid out by the charter. The impossibility/practicability of the task is irrelevant to Topic. Ditto ethics. Ditto the 'webmasters' suggestion though (friendly advice is welcome). | |
| Nov 2, 2015 at 3:52 | history | answered | Michael HamptonMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |