Timeline for Unsupported setup, is it a valid question?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Nov 25, 2015 at 18:13 | answer | added | Kara Marfia | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 23, 2015 at 12:31 | history | edited | sivann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 264 characters in body
|
| Nov 23, 2015 at 12:17 | history | edited | sivann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 264 characters in body
|
| Nov 21, 2015 at 10:39 | answer | added | Daniel | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 20, 2015 at 11:38 | comment | added | sivann | @JimB Please don't be snoot with other people's budget and needs. I already explained the buisiness need. Of course the orthodox answer is to poor more money on a project, but it's not always the right answer. | |
| Nov 20, 2015 at 0:18 | comment | added | Jim B | @sivann, if this is a config you are supporting on your own than its even less appropriate than others have answered. SF is about regular business management situations, not a kludge put together to build a garage system. | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 8:57 | comment | added | sivann | @Reaces yes you could say they are abysimal compared to the US | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 8:36 | comment | added | Reaces | The main issue I would say is that most of these questions are in a round-a-bout way duplicates. Why? Because most of the time the answer is there is a solution but it isn't worth the time, unless your hourly rates are abysmal a supported solution is cheaper. | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 11:08 | answer | added | user9517 | timeline score: 12 | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 10:58 | history | reopened | user9517 discussion Users with the discussion badge or a synonym can single-handedly close discussion questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed. | ||
| Nov 17, 2015 at 10:56 | history | closed | user9517 discussion Users with the discussion badge or a synonym can single-handedly close discussion questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed. | Duplicate of Are questions about legacy products inherently off-topic on Server Fault? | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 9:19 | history | edited | sivann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 209 characters in body
|
| Nov 17, 2015 at 9:08 | comment | added | sivann | @MichaelHampton I didn't know this about the votes. This is not a question about the drives, there is the original question for that. This is for the policy of SF about questions for setups not supported/predicted by the vendors. | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 9:06 | history | edited | sivann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 214 characters in body
|
| Nov 17, 2015 at 9:03 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | Votes on meta have a different meaning to the main site: They are used to indicate agreement or disagreement. I didn't downvote you, but I do think that selling the drives on (after a secure erase) is probably the best idea. | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 9:01 | comment | added | sivann | Oh god, another downvote. Why is that? | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 9:00 | history | edited | sivann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Nov 17, 2015 at 8:55 | history | asked | sivann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |