Timeline for Answerer's answer locked for the chattiness of others
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2015 at 13:02 | comment | added | ewwhite | In addition, the OP never reported back information about the processor scaling/power management settings on the server. So I don't think they were committed to a solution. But yes, the comments went off-topic. | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 5:58 | vote | accept | Iwillnotexist Idonotexist | ||
| Nov 30, 2015 at 4:54 | comment | added | womble Mod | Comments on an answer should, IMO, relate to that answer, not any details which may happen to be mentioned elsewhere on the page. That's why I characterise the comments stemming from (and including) the comment "It's a VPS" as off-topic. | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 4:35 | comment | added | Iwillnotexist Idonotexist | In my experience, on SO when a chat room gets opened it acts as an outlet valve and rarely are further comments added to the post itself. The chat activity does die out rather quickly though, just as it would have if it were left to peter out below the post. Whence my feature request above for normal users to be able to trigger migration to chatroom by themselves and contain the conversation. In this case, the comments were, imho, at least semi-topical, at least insofar as we were trying to tease out the responsibility of the hypervisor for OP's awful performance. | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 3:49 | history | answered | wombleMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |