Timeline for How should we deal with old link-only answers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Jan 12, 2016 at 14:05 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/ServerFault/status/686911881064411137 | ||
| Jan 11, 2016 at 14:47 | answer | added | Ben N | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 11, 2016 at 8:45 | answer | added | user1669039 | timeline score: -2 | |
| Jan 9, 2016 at 22:52 | history | edited | kasperd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 148 characters in body
|
| Jan 9, 2016 at 19:10 | comment | added | user9517 | This just got pushed to the front page and is probably a better example and several of teh answers appear to be just links elsewhere without any supporting commentary. | |
| Jan 9, 2016 at 17:24 | comment | added | HBruijn Mod | Sometimes the link only answer is even the accepted answer as well, so at that time the OP found it useful and who would I be to disagree? | |
| Jan 9, 2016 at 16:31 | answer | added | user9517 | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jan 9, 2016 at 15:52 | history | asked | kasperd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |