Timeline for Many old questions getting additional proftpd/vsftpd tags
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2016 at 8:22 | comment | added | MadHatter | @Ninj I can't fault your understanding: meta is indeed different from the main site, and has a somewhat different set of practices (particularly as regards downvoting). I certainly wouldn't pre-populate answers on the main site. | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 10:47 | comment | added | Ninj | Oops, i missed the fact that you were the OP. However I don't like the idea to write ready YES/NO naswers to for lazy people. SF force is for non lazy people who have things to say :) But i may miss the point of the meta section, i'm not used to it yet. | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 9:26 | comment | added | MadHatter |
@Ninj When I wrote the question, I also wrote two stock answers, one YES and one NO, for people who wished simply to vote without expressing further opinions. The comparitive votes on those two stock answers are the main reason I conclude that the community is in favour of such retagging. Anyone who wants to speak at more length in an answer is welcome to do so, and several have; but my main interest was not to persuade others but to take the community's viewpoint.
|
|
| Feb 1, 2016 at 9:09 | comment | added | Ninj | I have nothing against your answer, but arguments here would help people get the big picture. | |
| Jan 25, 2016 at 17:24 | vote | accept | MadHatter | ||
| Feb 1, 2016 at 8:30 | |||||
| Jan 21, 2016 at 8:17 | history | answered | MadHatter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |