Timeline for Honeypotting Serverfault for questions that should not be asked! Should this stop?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2016 at 19:19 | comment | added | user9517 | I don't believe a graduated site has ever been shut down. To get to the point of being shut down you have to get to very low levels of questions which even without the cPanel stuff isn't likely to happen on SF. You are flogging a dead donkey, honestly give up you're becoming a troll. | |
| Jan 30, 2016 at 19:14 | comment | added | Kraang Prime | I wish that was correct, but it is well known, when a community on stackexchange fails to meet certain numbers statistically, that community is closed or put under review pending judgement. It is also feasible for meta to remove all such content, including the keyword, as certain ranks can delete keywords, and even higher can delete posts/questions. | |
| Jan 30, 2016 at 19:12 | comment | added | Kraang Prime | Also, I have seen claims that cPanel is supported under certain conditions. If said conditions exist, they would be listed. Further, there would be historical examples of non-closed (or otherwise negatively adjusted by meta) cPanel threads with healthy discussion. From what I can tell, this has yet to happen. There are a couple here and there open with cPanel, but not about administrating that box, and thus justification for my claim that cPanel is verboten even from an administrative perspective due to lack of understanding. | |
| Jan 30, 2016 at 19:11 | comment | added | Ward - Trying Codidact Mod | #2 is "impossible" because it's not how this place works. The community of active users are not the owners, it's not our site, we don't care about the traffic stats. | |
| Jan 30, 2016 at 19:08 | comment | added | Kraang Prime | The solutions provided are not impossible. #3 is current status, and while facetious, is forthright and accurate in description whether this is favorable or not, the intent was to bring to the table clearly, and concisely the predicament serverfault is in currently. #1 and #2 are viable solutions. Keywording your site for content you do not support is shady and primarily used by very slimy places online. I do not feel that this is a 'best practices' measure for this site and what i said in combination makes this a very poor resource when landing here under those terms. Bait and switch. | |
| Jan 30, 2016 at 18:58 | history | answered | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |