Timeline for What to do with the "rm -rf" hoax question
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2016 at 14:31 | comment | added | Shog9 | This gets into weird situations WRT the content license; normally we only disassociate upon author request, and only when deletion isn't desirable. Dup'd or merged, the question serves as a useful redirect to the original, which could actually do some good as a public-service message of sorts here. | |
| Apr 15, 2016 at 14:01 | comment | added | Desperatuss0ccus | @Sven You can ask the SE devs to do it. They've done it for me for a lot less, so I imagine they'd be willing to do it for you, given that this impacts other users and is a documented hoax at this point. | |
| Apr 15, 2016 at 13:55 | comment | added | user9517 | Nuke the user, it's the only way to be sure. | |
| Apr 15, 2016 at 13:54 | comment | added | Sven Mod | I can't do this without deleting the user, but since this wasn't his only post, I don't want to do this. I really like Iain's approach, which I hadn't considered. | |
| Apr 15, 2016 at 13:47 | history | answered | Desperatuss0ccus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |