Skip to main content

Timeline for Should downvotes be moderated?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 28, 2016 at 17:39 comment added sysfiend @KatherineVillyard yeah, I know, but know, with so many specific questions, even a +2 makes a huge difference
Apr 28, 2016 at 17:33 comment added Katherine Villyard @Alex Answers with more upvotes have a community consensus that they're useful. That's more than the opinion of just one person.
Apr 28, 2016 at 12:37 comment added sysfiend @joeqwerty we can start a quite long discussion here on whether opinions should be respected or not but it has nothing to do here. Anyways, I've been consulting StackExchange communities for over a year now and I always felt that answers with more upvotes than others appear to be better (wheter it is because of it's content, explanation or final result) so, I see votes as something more than just opinion.
Apr 28, 2016 at 12:29 comment added joeqwerty @Alex: Opinions aren't fair, or unfair, or right, or wrong... they're opinions. Users should be free to freely express their opinions with downvotes and comments as they see fit so long as they aren't personal attacks. Why should that free expression be moderated or dictated?
Apr 28, 2016 at 9:29 comment added sysfiend My bad, didn't know that. Anyways, it's not any idea, I'm just asking to see what people think about how voting system works.
Apr 28, 2016 at 9:27 comment added Sven Mod Downvotes on meta are mainly used to indicate agreement or disagreement. Your three downvotes mean three people disagree with this idea.
Apr 28, 2016 at 9:27 comment added HBruijn Mod Votes on meta are used to indicate agreement (up) or disagreement (down)
Apr 28, 2016 at 9:26 comment added sysfiend I get that voting is an opinion, but opinions can have better or worse arguments. For example, I already got two downvotes here just for the fact of asking, how can that be fair?
Apr 28, 2016 at 9:20 history answered SvenMod CC BY-SA 3.0