Timeline for Failed a test while reviewing by flagging a question as a duplicate. Now tell me you won't do the same
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Oct 16, 2016 at 18:45 | vote | accept | Anubioz | ||
| Oct 7, 2016 at 16:38 | history | edited | OdedStaffMod |
edited tags; edited tags
|
|
| Oct 7, 2016 at 15:55 | comment | added | Katherine Villyard | Yeah, sorry if I wasn't clear, @Anubioz. It's not reviewing that's a waste of time, it's the audits. Whatever code generates them is sometimes wrong, and... what Reaces said, really. | |
| Oct 7, 2016 at 9:59 | comment | added | Anubioz | @jennyD Thanks for the info, I'll start using it right away :). I cannot understand why Unicode doesn't have that symbol from wikipedia though. A stupid flying man 🕴, which will never be used by anyone, is there, while reversed question mark isn't... | |
| Oct 7, 2016 at 9:52 | comment | added | Jenny D | @Anubioz Yes, that's what I'm saying. It's been used that way in some online communities I've been a part of since the 1990's. For some reason it never got any traction on the web, and nowadays people will just use emoticons instead. (. Kids these days, getoffmylawn... .) | |
| Oct 7, 2016 at 9:51 | comment | added | Anubioz | @JennyD Sorry if i'm taking it serious wrongfully, but denoting irony has always been a huge problem for me (most of people tend to get me wrong for some reason :). Are you saying that a parenthesis followed by a period can/should be used for sarcastic sentences? Like (. Here goes sarcasm .)? | |
| Oct 7, 2016 at 9:44 | history | edited | Anubioz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
| Oct 7, 2016 at 9:44 | comment | added | Jenny D | @Anubioz There is an irony punctuation. (.This is sufficient irony/sarcasm punctiuation for the whole world!.) Only very few people use it... | |
| Oct 7, 2016 at 9:39 | history | edited | Anubioz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1191 characters in body
|
| Oct 7, 2016 at 6:06 | answer | added | Reaces | timeline score: 9 | |
| Oct 6, 2016 at 20:36 | comment | added | user9517 | You misread what Katherine and I said ... 'Review Audits are a waste of time' (for a good reviewer) | |
| Oct 6, 2016 at 20:35 | comment | added | Anubioz | @Hanginoninquietdesperation World really needs irony punctuation, i was just joking ;) As for "wasting time" - you can do reviews in the interims between work, while answering the question requires much more dedicated time (at least for me :) | |
| Oct 6, 2016 at 20:28 | comment | added | user9517 | It's not that rare - 270 people have them and Katherine has 4 ... Review audit's are a waste of a good reviewers time. | |
| Oct 6, 2016 at 19:25 | answer | added | Michael HamptonMod | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 6, 2016 at 19:20 | comment | added | Anubioz | @KatherineVillyard Oh, you just jealous of my super-duper rare "Reviewer" badge :) | |
| Oct 6, 2016 at 19:08 | comment | added | Katherine Villyard | Review audits are a waste of time. | |
| Oct 6, 2016 at 18:49 | history | edited | Anubioz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Oct 6, 2016 at 18:36 | history | asked | Anubioz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |