Timeline for How to address a user who inappropriately edited an accepted answer
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.serverfault.com/ with https://meta.serverfault.com/
|
|
Nov 21, 2016 at 21:09 | vote | accept | user5870571 | ||
Nov 21, 2016 at 19:54 | answer | added | HBruijnMod | timeline score: 4 | |
Nov 21, 2016 at 15:47 | comment | added | yagmoth555 Mod | Yes, and if the user revert back after you, he should not in your case, but generally speaking you flag the post, and you can come back there to report. The moderator can stop the edit war and warn the user. but it's like EEAA suggest, it's a per-case basic in such case. | |
Nov 21, 2016 at 15:16 | comment | added | user5870571 | Thanks everyone. That is all good information. I assume the underlying answer is if the person who edited your post has over 2k points then you either have to change it back or leave it alone. | |
Nov 21, 2016 at 15:10 | comment | added | yagmoth555 Mod | The edit chain is not that bad, as such you added an '@' to let know it's to tag an username in the end. For the last part of your question please see there meta.stackexchange.com/questions/179257/… for edit notification. An answerer will get notified to review only if the editor got less than 2k points, and you might miss the review approval if the community approve it first. For over 2k editor the approval is immediate, but you get notified that your answer was edited. | |
Nov 21, 2016 at 14:45 | comment | added | Sven Mod | If this concerns your last revision from today, you just move on - there is no need to have a second thought about this, let alone post here. Also, frankly I consider the edit an improvement, not because your post actually was rude, but because it could appear so to the casual viewer. | |
Nov 21, 2016 at 14:24 | comment | added | EEAA Mod | There are far too many variables at play here for us to answer without seeing the question you're referring to. Please link it. | |
Nov 21, 2016 at 14:15 | history | asked | user5870571 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |