Timeline for Which corporate IT policy or firewall rule is being circumvented in this scenario?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2017 at 19:05 | comment | added | user9517 | That means that 3/4 didn't. Your question is closed. It's so unlikely to be reopened that I'm walking away now and not coming back so don't waste your life on me and I'll reciprocate. | |
| Jan 8, 2017 at 18:16 | comment | added | Gaia | Over a quarter of the answers there state that context should be taken in consideration: i.imgur.com/NL8F0UZ.png i.imgur.com/qSASZbi.png i.imgur.com/fXGKMu1.png, which is not happening here. It is also assumed that relaying our content thru our server, which works exactly because it doesn't break firewall policy (if they wanted to block all video streaming they would block all video streaming) is circumvention, when it is really adaptation. Everyone looked at it as if this is some binary issue. No one asked for context, except Michael Hampton. | |
| Jan 8, 2017 at 17:18 | comment | added | user9517 | meta.serverfault.com/a/2647/9517 | |
| Jan 8, 2017 at 17:01 | comment | added | user9517 | Here on meta of course, meta.serverfault.com/q/2497/9517, meta.serverfault.com/q/1216/9517, meta.serverfault.com/q/6131/9517 and probably more here if you care to sift through it. | |
| Jan 8, 2017 at 16:51 | comment | added | Gaia | I'm curious, not doubtful, where is this long standing policy mentioned? | |
| Jan 8, 2017 at 16:48 | history | answered | user9517 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
