Timeline for Delete 'server' tag
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2011 at 23:25 | answer | added | JamesBarnett | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 27, 2010 at 1:43 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | @Stefan, while I see your point I think the server tag is far too generic to be of any real value. Server questions should be tagged with one or more tags appropriate to the actual make and model of server to be useful. | |
| Oct 26, 2010 at 17:33 | comment | added | Stefan Lasiewski | The 'server' tag does help to distinguish a question from 'storage' (Like a Netapp or storage array, not a server), or 'networking' (also not a server) or 'security policies'. | |
| Oct 24, 2010 at 21:30 | history | edited | Brad Mace | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 297 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2010 at 21:21 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | While I agree that we don't require the server tag, this site is NOT "all about servers". Your view of system administrations is too narrow. A significant number of questions are unrelated to servers. Likewise, there are many admins who never get to work on a server at all. | |
| Oct 22, 2010 at 20:45 | comment | added | Ben Pilbrow | +1, I HATE that tag. It does seem kind of redundant in 99% of cases. | |
| Oct 22, 2010 at 18:39 | comment | added | jscott | On a daily basis I also deal with users, software, networks, security, workstations, etc. I've seen questions, on SF, directly related to each of these items. None of these items are servers, nor would they qualify for a [server] tag. But this is a community-built site. You brought your question to the correct place to be addressed. | |
| Oct 22, 2010 at 17:26 | history | asked | Brad Mace | CC BY-SA 2.5 |