Skip to main content
Server Fault

Return to Question

Tweeted twitter.com/ServerFault/status/1063310820820566016
Use proper markup for tags
Source Link
kasperd
kasperd
  • 31k
  • 1
  • 12
  • 26

I've noticed that on the Main-site there are the tags cable, cables, cabling, and cable-management. The latter is the only one with a description, which says:

the term used to describe how one cables up an infrastructure.

I see two options:

Either some or all of the other three tags are redundant and should be merged, or there is a different meaning behind them and they need a proper description.

Which one is it?

I've noticed that on the Main-site there are the tags cable, cables, cabling, and cable-management. The latter is the only one with a description, which says:

the term used to describe how one cables up an infrastructure.

I see two options:

Either some or all of the other three tags are redundant and should be merged, or there is a different meaning behind them and they need a proper description.

Which one is it?

I've noticed that on the Main-site there are the tags , , , and . The latter is the only one with a description, which says:

the term used to describe how one cables up an infrastructure.

I see two options:

Either some or all of the other three tags are redundant and should be merged, or there is a different meaning behind them and they need a proper description.

Which one is it?

Source Link
Arsak
Arsak
  • 101
  • 4

Do the four 'cable'-related tags differ or should we merge them?

I've noticed that on the Main-site there are the tags cable, cables, cabling, and cable-management. The latter is the only one with a description, which says:

the term used to describe how one cables up an infrastructure.

I see two options:

Either some or all of the other three tags are redundant and should be merged, or there is a different meaning behind them and they need a proper description.

Which one is it?