To expand on this:

announced that the use of AI-detection tooling to identify AI/LLM generated content for the purposes of deletion/bannning is now banned

I'll add two points:

• At least on Stack Overflow, we've not been using any automated detector as a primary (or for most/all of us, any) factor in removing generated content. It's been plainly obvious they were unreliable since about week 2 of this crisis.
• The edicts from staff in private go further than most publicly available statements. To follow the private rules, we are unable to remove AI content outside of the narrowest of circumstances. Effectively, we are not allowed to remove AI content for any reason regardless of detection method.

To expand on this:

announced that the use of AI-detection tooling to identify AI/LLM generated content for the purposes of deletion/bannning is now banned

I'll add two points:

• At least on Stack Overflow, we've not been using any automated detector as a primary (or for most/all of us, any) factor in removing generated content. It's been plainly obvious they were unreliable since about week 2 of this crisis.
• The edicts from staff in private go further than most publicly available statements. To follow the private rules, we are unable to remove AI content outside of the narrowest of circumstances. Effectively, we are not allowed to remove content on the basis of it being AI-generated regardless of detection method.