Timeline for Labor action notice
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2023 at 10:45 | comment | added | Randall | "In the wake of ChatGPT's release" - you mean ChatGPT-4 (aka Bing, aka Sidney)? Or are you referring to an earlier release? | |
| Jun 7, 2023 at 20:55 | history | edited | sysadmin1138Mod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 61 characters in body
|
| Jun 7, 2023 at 20:25 | history | edited | sysadmin1138Mod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Add link to the data
|
| Jun 7, 2023 at 19:20 | comment | added | Shog9 | The reason I suggest this is that it would help separate effects caused by formerly-active users dropping off and those caused by fewer new users becoming active. It wouldn't necessarily point to a smoking gun here, but narrowing the (fairly vast) field of potential culprits is probably useful! | |
| Jun 7, 2023 at 19:17 | comment | added | Shog9 | This is interesting, thanks! I realize you're walking a fine line here, but something I'd encourage pushing on is whether they've directly tracked the trajectories of users who were active (three months ago, 6, a year, 2 years, etc) - that is, tracking specific users, not the usual "x active users during y period" metric available on the usual charts. When I ran this in the past, I found a fairly stable fall-off in activity, albeit one that has changed over time: e.g., folks who joined in 2012 lasted a lot longer than folks who joined in 2016 and longer than folks who joined in 2011. | |
| Jun 6, 2023 at 23:18 | comment | added | Peter - Reinstate Monica | "To their credit, this data was directly asked for and they've given it." After the community went on strike, yes. | |
| Jun 6, 2023 at 21:46 | history | answered | sysadmin1138Mod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |