I spent an afternoon figuring out a fairly specific problem involving NFS. There were several surprising pitfalls to be aware of, so I preserved my steps as a self-answered question for posterity:

Mount NFS volume on Ubuntu Linux server from macOS client

The question got closed as off-topic because it didn't have a "clear problem statement". But I'm not sure how to make the question better. It seems pretty clear and precise to me.

Can the question be improved so as to be on-topic? Or is it simply unsuitable for StackExchange? (I could move it to my blog.)


So, first off, I appreciate the efforts you put into this, and appreciate the fact that you came to SF to share the knowledge gained in working through the problem. In fact, this is something I've had to deal with in the past and ended up spending far too much time trying to get it to work.

Moving on to your question:

We typically frown on "I can haz tutorial plx? Kthx." type of questions. We value truly understanding problems and solutions, and regurgitating a series of steps for someone to copy/paste does not encourage them to understand what they're doing.

That said, I would recommend that you change your question to include some of the issues you ran into while working through the problem, and then include responses to those issues in your answer.

If you do that, I'd vote to get your question re-opened.


As one of the closers, I'll explain my rationale.

Firstly, the answer is great. Sufficient detail, without being unnecessarily verbose, and it explains what's going on. I've upvoted it, and any future answers like it will get more upvotes from me.

The question, on the other hand, doesn't fit well on the site. I can see what you were trying to do -- create a "place" for your great answer. However, as a Question-and-Answer site, questions really need to be able to stand alone. They need to be something which someone else could also reasonably answer, within the groundrules of the site.

There's also a "general-purposeness" test I apply (there used to be a specific close reason for it). If a question is too tightly scoped to the questioner's specific situation, it is unlikely to be of value to others who come across it in the future (ie via Google). Since we're not here to be the private, unpaid helpdesk for question-askers, if an answer will only help that one person, I don't see much value to it.

Your question leans rather heavily on the boundary of "too specific". Your question, as written, only applies to Ubuntu 14.04, Mac OS X Yosemite, and NFS. Removing too many of those things would make it "too broad", but there's a middle ground where a revised question would sit very nicely, I think.

The solution I'd recommend for you is to ask one question per question. The fact that your answer has two separate top-level headings is a (small) clue that your question is trying to cover too much. Installing and configuring an NFS server on Ubuntu (or Debian) is a useful question in and of itself. Similarly, configuring Mac OS X as an NFS client is a useful question, all by itself. By splitting your question in two, you're improving the applicability of each question and providing a tighter focus. People trying to setup a Mac OS X NFS client against (say) a NetApp won't think "oh, that question's about an Ubuntu NFS server, it doesn't apply to me".

To expand on EEAA's answer with regards to questions of the form "I can haz tutorial plz?", the reason why we dislike them is that they encourage bad behaviour on the part of other question-askers. Seeing other people ask, "please tell me how to do my job" encourages more questions of that same form (although often in barely comprehensible prose). It's not fun to deal with the resulting indignant bunfights when we close the questions, so we try (with limited success) to head the problem off at the pass by doing everything we can to discourage the question being asked in the first place. It may not be a perfect system (in fact, I'm quite certain it isn't), but it's the least-worst one we've come up with so far.

  • Thanks a lot, and to @EEAA as well - that's really helpful. I'll see if I can split the question up, or perhaps I'll migrate it to my blog. – Jo Liss Sep 8 '15 at 23:00

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .