Here is a list for Microsoft Small Business Server tags that do not mention version number:
- sbs x 46
- sbs-server x 2
- small-business-server x 96
Here is a list of all SBS tags that I can find which are version specific:
Let's come to an official conclusion about how to name these tags.
Generic SBS tag:
I propose small-business-server be the official base tag for the product line. sbs and sbs-server should be merged into small-business-server. "Microsoft" and "Windows" don't need to be in the tag. It is better served if that is a separate tag in the question, e.g. windows small-business-server ("Microsoft" is too broad of a keyword and doesn't seem helpful).Certainly, the words "small business server" can mean something other than the Microsoft Windows Small Business Server product, but I doubt too many people are going to be tagging a question about a small server for their business with small-business-server and if they do, it can be retagged. Thoughts?
Version Specific Tags:
Either we petition for the tag length limit to be increased or we use the acronym "SBS" in the version specific tags. I propose that the nomenclature be SBS-[year]-[additional features]. So sbs2003 should be merged with sbs-2003. sbs-2011-essentials, while not existing yet, could just as sbs-2011-premium may exist as well.
That means that a post about the Exchange instance running on a Small Business Server 2008 machine would most logically be tagged with exchange-2007 and sbs-2008 and possibly include small-business-server and windows. Thoughts?
Summary:
Assuming what I laid out above is accepted, here is the course of action:
- Merge sbs and sbs-server into small-business-server.
- Merge sbs2003 into sbs-2003.
- Merge windows-sbs-2008 into sbs-2008