Here is a list for Microsoft Small Business Server tags that do not mention version number:
- sbs x 46
- sbs-server x 2
- small-business-server x 96
Here is a list of all SBS tags that I can find which are version specific:
Let's come to an official conclusion about how to name these tags.
Generic SBS tag
I propose small-business-server be the official base tag for the product line. sbs and sbs-server should be merged into small-business-server. "Microsoft" and "Windows" don't need to be in the tag. It is better served if that is a separate tag in the question, e.g. windows small-business-server ("Microsoft" is too broad of a keyword and doesn't seem helpful).
Certainly, the words "small business server" can mean something other than the Microsoft Windows Small Business Server product, but I doubt too many people are going to be tagging a question about a small server for their business with small-business-server and if they do, it can be retagged. Thoughts?
Version Specific Tags
Either we petition for the tag length limit to be increased or we use the acronym "SBS" in the version specific tags. I propose that the nomenclature be SBS-[year]-[additional features]. So sbs2003 should be merged with sbs-2003. sbs-2011-essentials, while not existing yet, could just as sbs-2011-premium may exist as well.
That means that a post about the Exchange instance running on a Small Business Server 2008 machine would most logically be tagged with exchange-2007 and sbs-2008 and possibly include small-business-server and windows. Thoughts?
Summary
Assuming what I laid out above is accepted, here is the course of action:
- Merge sbs and sbs-server into small-business-server.
- Merge sbs2003 into sbs-2003.
- Merge windows-sbs-2008 into sbs-2008
