To be honest I'm kinda torn by this. 

I know people who are still using WfW 3.11, they will continue to do so for the next decade or so too. They knew this would happen when they started the project and took appropriate actions. From a hardware perspective they bought sufficient extra to last them the lifetime of the project. From a software perspective they got stable with the platform and developed their programs against it. Any bus that may turn up get fixed against the same platform or the program gets migrated (at considerable cost) to a newer more supported platform. These guys are good - we will never see a question from them.

If someone asks a question about **_maintaining_** a legacy environment then it's helpful to answer it. 

If though, someone is developing with a legacy environment then it is **not** helpful to answer it because **_using a legacy environment for something new is the wrong thing to do_**. It should be closed off topic with the reason:  **_Questions should demonstrate reasonable business information technology management practices_**.

We are not the internet's support safety net.