The recent discussion around the [WebServer Benchmarks][1] question has me thinking. 

This question poses a generally useful query that doesn't have one true answer. Part of our mission is to understand the usefulness of "Good Subjective" questions to the rest of the community.

Our current "opinion-based" close reason is not up to the task of indicating that "Good Subjective" questions still have a home at ServerFault and the other StackExchange sites.

The current wording is:

    primarily opinion-based
    
    Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert 
    experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely 
    based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.

This close reason should be re-worded to better convey this core principle and encourage new question reviewers not to close subjective questions that have merit and value for Professional system and network administrators.


  [1]: http://serverfault.com/questions/538258/are-most-webserver-benchmarks-useless