Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with editing
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 126632
7
votes
Accepted
Suggested edit queue full
I always thought it was kind of silly to require someone who has a high enough reputation to edit a post themselves without approval from others must get approval from others to approve someone else's …
- 251k
3
votes
Why did I not get notified that my edit was declined?
Pulling up the review, it looks like one community member approved, but two others thought your edit was more appropriate as a comment. They voted "attempt to reply": "This edit was intended to addres …
- 251k
21
votes
Accepted
Does copy editing Unicode punctuation into posts contribute value?
No, they don't add value. In some cases, they detract and should be removed.
It's a more common problem on SO, but I do occasionally see it on SF: A post will have code or a shell script where the qu …
- 251k
18
votes
Accepted
Should we approve edits that remove chatty anecdotes from answers?
should be well-written and not contain notes about the editing process or any other irrelevancies such as signatures. They should be able to stand on their own. … All of the history (pun intended) of the editing of a post is trivially available just by clicking on it, so long explanations about the edit, the text "EDIT" itself, etc., detract from the post, rather …
- 251k