Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with tag-burnination
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 126632
13
votes
Should the port-80 tag be burninated?
I also see absolutely no purpose to either of these tags. I would not complain to see them gone.
- 251k
5
votes
Accepted
burninate the [index] tag
No one watches this tag, it has few questions, and it has no obvious use. It should indeed be burninated.
- 251k
2
votes
Poll: Administrator tag
This tag not only should be burninated, it should be blacklisted, so that it can never be used again.
- 251k