Search Results

We have 5 (top level) close reasons For a long time, we had 4 migration targets. The 'short' lists in the 10K tools view is 3 items. … Necessity gave us the 5th migration target, and the 5th OT reason. Also, there isn't a big call for a 6th. …

Overall, systemically, the SF migration target worked w-a-y back when it was just the trilogy. … It may be a better idea overall to replace the SF and SU migration targets with U&L and DBA, though that's the kind of thing that should be really worked out between all of the communities involved. …

There is a bit of a disconnect between how ServerFault handles question-migration and how the rest of the SE network handles it. … Mods do question arbitrage in the Teachers Lounge when we get flags with dubious migration candidacy, and normal users can do the same. …

Our FAQ is pretty clear on this: and it is not about … Networking outside the professional workplace Running servers at home for personal use And yes, this does mean that there is n …

I was the one who marked that as declined because I've used these tools, have seen them used in sysadmin environments, and know the use-cases behind them. Each distro does have ways of customizing dep …

Mm, that's a dirty question. That'll require a fair amount of back-n-forth to really get the right details.

Jeff Atwood has raised some concerns in this regard, specifically relating to the long tail. Speaking as the high user in the netware tag, I can say that even 5 year old information can still be usefu …

I asked this over on webmasters.meta and the response was pretty clear. They stay on SF. Server-side webmastery thingies like php/apache/mysql configs are clearly Our Problem. Things like picking whi …

This conversation and ones on SO-Meta are beginning to make me rethink what qualifies as vote-to-close versus vote-to-move in my head. I've lurked on SU for a while, and am beginning to get an idea as …