Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with syntax-highlighting
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 33417
5
votes
Broken highlighting. ruby-on-rails
There's no "ruby" highlighting. The tag is set to use "default". As you've pointed out it seems broken. I'm going to turn it off unless someone can come up with a great reason it should be on.
- 78.3k
3
votes
Syntax highlighting based on tag
We should enable Manually specify language for syntax highlighting so people in the know can add the relevant language descriptor to posts. It'd be nice too if the Question box auto prompted you (a bo …
CommunityBot
- 1