Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with disputed-review-audits
Search options not deleted
user 6177
2
votes
Audit Question: This type of question most appropriately belongs on the Security stack
Even though the question is acceptable here, I think flagging it for migration is a totally valid choice and ideally shouldn't be considered a failed review.
Unfortunately, this is not the first time …
- 13k
8
votes
How to deal with "marginal" answers on review?
I'm not sure if this is a useful answer, but it is a way to deal with the marginal cases that audits present.
For virtually all the reviewing I do, I click through and look at the actual question and …
- 13k