Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with tags
Search options not deleted
user 72586
This question relates to tags, the words or phrases which describe the topic of a Server Fault questions.
4
votes
10
votes
1
answer
193
views
Apache tags - a bit of a mess?
I don't think something like apache-httpd-2.0 etc. would be sane or reasonable, but we should probably have some discussion on how to handle these tags. … Maybe crunch the 2.x tags all into apache2 in the same way that, say, the service packs for Windows Server tags don't merit their own tag? …
- 116k