Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with discussion
Search options not deleted
user 74406
The question you're asking is designed to solicit opinions or best-practices on a particular topic, with the goal of reaching community consensus.
2
votes
Server Fault Conference
ServerFault presents:
RedunDay
Ops-Con
CapaciCon
Scale Tippers
PerfCon
Server Vault
User Overflow
That's all I have right now
- 15.8k
1
vote
Free LOPSA Memberships
I'd love a free membership. Yay!
3
votes
3
answers
298
views
Should we be more tolerant of "Lack of Research"?
Possible duplicate or follow-on of: Questions lacking minimal understanding
One of the perennial cries in ServerFault is that new users' questions often show a lack of research. This leads to a quick …
- 15.8k
17
votes
6
answers
612
views
How does the community feel about deleting the April Fools' question?
There has been a bit of offline discussion about the value of keeping these questions around. It was an obvious April Fools' Day joke, but do those kind of things deserve to stay around? …
- 15.8k
15
votes
Proposed change to Server Fault guidelines, round 2
I believe that the issue about professionalism is just as much reflected in the presentation of the question as it is the content of the question. New users are going to write their issue in the box …
- 15.8k
5
votes